6. I have seen many «unqualified» scholars in the Iranian universities, and I am sensitive toward using phrases such as «Engineer» or «Doctor» on the cover page. It is not only in case of this book, this is just a very good example. There are so many books that are written by relatively unknown scholars, yet when translated the translator have used «Eng» or «Doctor» prefix to describe him/herself on the cover page.

2) There are people whose English are weaker than the translator so I admire him to at least try to convey the writer’s point regardless of whether he did a good job or no. We should be supportive not discrediting.

3) I think it is important to mention his Doctorate Degree because he neither has a noble prize nor is famous like the writer so he needs to somehow prove that he is worthy of translating the book and showing that he has a Doctorate Degree, is the very first step to collect more trust. Labels or adjective are used to describe the noun. Some nouns are more descriptive than any label or adjectives like Max Planck. There is no need to describe it anyhow better and any label you used could be a miss-description. On the other hand, some nouns need a little more description to become liable. That is were we use labels. There is no negative point about it.

4) He honored the “biggest scientist of 20th century” by spending his time translating his idea so that the B can have a wider range of audience; to get to that point he even used his own credits to collect more audiences for the B.

6) I thought you are against the legal freedom and supportive of the real freedom. In your judgment, you took the right of the little ones to express who they are and what they have accomplished just because there is a bigger power over their head.

5) I found your point of view negative, biased, mean, devaluing, judgmental and ashamed to say somehow sounded jealous.